Context needs itself to exist. It is the penultimate surreal word (after surreal itself). Curiously enough, surreal was originally a back formation from surrealism; the mindset existed in a literal form before the literary meaning was even reached. So it makes sense that it is the ultimate surreal word (e.t.e. literally). But I am getting lost in the description of the context; let's get back to the context.
Try to describe to me the meaning of the simple noun. To do this, you must first describe the rules of grammar, which is the foundation for language (the foundation of words). But underneath this, you must describe the foundation of language, which is thought. Basically, the context gives you everything that you need to describe this word -and I have not even given you the word yet!
If I were a crueler man, I might ask you to define context, but that would defeat the purpose. You know what is odd, I am writing this in my journal. And I have been trying here to capture part of the banter which is bouncing around in my head. If I do put this on my blog, it will probably confuse people, since they will think it is written to them. Interesting. This context is kind of beating me in my attempt to overcome it through my description of it.
Why cannot people seem to grasp that no thing can be defined in an verbal or literal form without a thorough exploration of the reality within which it rests? See, to be a bit of a poet; I would say that reality is always at rest, it is never stressed or pressured, it is either ignored or championed. Humanity's weakness is found in its belief that it can affect that rest or increase what could be called the "heartbeat of reality."
Words develop in the same way that we encourage order. For instance, look at a filing system: we begin with larger files and then delineate all the way down to a specific fact. In the same way, we educate through broad areas, increase our knowledge towards a specialization which we believe will fit, or be useful, to us in the area of work by which we often identify ourselves. This downward descriptiveness is the way that our brains work. When these facts begin to weave together with what we experience now, as well as what we have understood to be the past, we are beginning to touch upon context. And as we touch upon it, we soon lose ourselves in it, for once we have focused upon it, it begins to fade; as our minds seek to describe this thought which is so cleanly described, we must forget the word in order to understand it or to experience the identification which it gives to us.
